Comparative Morphology Of The Pancreas Of Experimental Animals And Humans

DOI: 10.29296/2618723X-2018-03-04

Ya.Gushchin, researcher, pathomorphologist, V. Shedko, PhD veterinary medicine, researcher, pathomorphologist, A. Muzhikyan, PhD veterinary medicine, senior researcher, Head of the Laboratory of Histology and Pathomorphology, M. Makarova, Director, V. Makarov, Doctor of Medicine, prof., Deputy dir. of science JSC Research-and-manufacturing company «Houm оf Pharmacy» 188663, Russia, Leningradskiy region, Vsevolozhskiy district, Kuzmolovskiy, st. Zavodskaya, 3, b. 245 E-mail: [email protected]


Keywords: shiitake mushroom oyster mushroom copulatory behaviour libido mammal social vole Microtus socialis

For citation:

Gushchin Ya., Shedko V., Muzhikyan A., Makarova M., Makarov V. Comparative Morphology Of The Pancreas Of Experimental Animals And Humans. Laboratory Animals for Science. 2018; 3. https://doi.org/10.29296/2618723X-2018-03-04

Abstract

The pancreas is an unpaired parenchymal organ that belongs to the glands of mixed secretion. It includes the exocrine and endocrine parts, while participating in digestion, and in the regulation of carbohydrate, protein and fat metabolism in tissues. The work of the pancreas obeys a fine neuro-humoral regulation, and its lesions lead to serious consequences. In pre-clinical studies, different types of laboratory animals are used, the pancreas of which in its structure and function is extremely similar to the human. However, there are differences that can have a significant effect on the result obtained in the experiment. In this comparative study, we tried to identify the similarities and differences in organ morphology in humans and laboratory animals. As a result of the analysis of the literature data, the basic similarities in the structure of the human pancreas and laboratory animals, both in anatomical and histological structure, were determined. The pancreas has the same source and patterns of development. The anatomical structure of the pancreas is different: a compact type in humans, in animals it belongs to the mesenteric type. Although the opinions of the authors in this matter are different. Despite this, each species in the pancreas is distinguished by the head, body and tail. The opinion of the researchers varies in the number of ducts in different animals. In the literature there are several variants of the duct system in animals. The histological structure of the pancreas is also of the same type. Exocrine part does not have significant features in different species. In the structure of the islet apparatus (islets of langerhans), it is possible to distinguish specific differences in the qualitative and quantitative composition of the insulocytes. This article can be useful not only for pharmacologists and toxicologists working in preclinical research, but also for histologists, physiologists and pathologists studying the pathology and physiology of the pancreas.

References

  1. Il`inyh M.A. Strukturno-funkcional`naya harakteristika podzheludochnoy zhelezy potomstva samok krys s hronicheskim porazheniem gepatobiliarnoy sistemy razlichnogo geneza. Avtoref. diss. na soisk. uch. step. kand. biol. nauk, Chelyabinsk. 2007: 20.
  2. Afanas`ev Yu.I., Yurina N.A. Gistologiya, citologiya i e`mbriologiya. M.:Medicina.2002: 744.
  3. Bektimirova M.R. Morfofunkcional`noe sostoyanie podzheludochnoy zhelezy i uroven` obshhego belka v syvorotke krovi krys pri vvedenii polioksidoniya. Scientific notes. 2017, 232:12–7.
  4. Sulaeva O.N. Uchebnoe posobie po gistologii. Zaporozhskiy gosudarstvennyy medicinskiy universitet. 2015:13.
  5. Yakovleva O.V., Sitdikova G.F., Yakovlev A.V. Praktikum po e`ndokrinologii. Metodicheskoe posobie. Kazan`, 2007: 26.
  6. Luis Rodrigo, Janeza Trdine Rijeka. Acute Pancreatitis. Croatia InTech. 2011: 288.
  7. Petrenko V.M. Podzheludochnaya zheleza v e`mbriogeneze. Byull. nauki i praktiki. 2017, 6: 72–89.
  8. Pivchenko P.G., Pivchenko T.P. Sravnitel`nyy analiz razvitiya podzheludochnoy zhelezy u cheloveka i beloy krysy v e`mbrional`nom periode (obosnovanie e`ksperimental`noy modeli). Original`nye nauchnye publikacii. 2016: 80–3.
  9. Kaligin M.S., Titova A.A., Plyushkina A.S., Titova M.A., Gumerova A.A., Kiyasov A.P. Proliferaciya kletok podzheludochnoy zhelezy pri e`ksperimental`nom diabete. Geny & kletki. 2014, Tom 4, 3: 85–8.
  10. Denisov S.D., Pivchenko T.P. Dinamika strukturnyh izmeneniy podzheludochnoy zhelezy v e`mbriogeneze beloy krysy. Sovremennye aspekty fundamental`noy i prikladnoy morfologii: sbornik trudov nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, posvyashhennoy 110-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya akademika NAN Belarusi D. M. Goluba. Minsk: BGMU. 2011: 316.
  11. Minoru Tsuchitani, Junko Sato Hiroko Kokoshima A comparison of the anatomical structure of the pancreas in experimental animals. Toxicol Pathol. 2016. Vol 29: 147–54.
  12. Sapin M. R. Anatomiya cheloveka v dvuh tomah. M.:Medicina. 2001.T. 2: 640.
  13. Petrenko V. M. Limfouzly podzheludochnoy zhelezy u morskoy svinki. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamental`nyh issledovaniy. 2014. 4: 52–4.
  14. Petrenko V.M. Forma i topografiya podzheludochnoy zhelezy u krysy. Uspehi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya. 2012. 2: 35–9.
  15. Petrenko V.M. Forma i topografiya podzheludochnoy zhelezy u morskoy svinki. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamental`nyh issledovaniy. 2013. 7: 36–9.
  16. Andreas Hornblad. Imaging the Pancreas New Aspects on Lobular Development and Adult Constitution. Print & Media Umeo. 2011: 50.
  17. Thomas Nolte, Patricia Brander-Weber, Charles Dangler. Nonproliferative and Proliferative Lesions of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Pancreas and Salivary Glands of the Rat and Mouse. Toxicol Pathol. 2016: 62
  18. Makarova M.N., Rybakova A.V., Gushhin Ya.A., Shed`ko V.V, Muzhikyan A.A., Makarov V.G. Anatomo-fiziologicheskaya harakteristika pishhevaritel`nogo trakta u cheloveka i laboratornyh zhivotnyh. Mezhdunarodnyy vestnik veterinarii. 2016. 1: 82–104.
  19. Petrenko V.M. Forma i topografiya podzheludochnoy zhelezy. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamental`nyh issledovaniy. 2015. 1: 1114–7.
  20. Lesa Thompson. Pet rabbit nutrition – structure and function of its gastrointestinal tract. Veterinary Times. 2013. 44(17): 12–4.
  21. Ron Rees Davies, Jennifer A.E. Rabbit gastrointestinal physiology. Vet Clin Exot Anim. 2003. 6: 139–53.
  22. Rosen Stefanov Dimitrov. Comparative Ultrasonographic, Anatomotopographic and Macromorphometric Study of the Spleen and Pancreas in Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Not Sci Biol. 2012. 4(3):14–20.
  23. Fraser P. A. Henderson J. R. The Arrangement of Endocrine and Exocrine Pancreatic Microcirculation Observed in the Living Rabbit. Quarterly Journal of Experiment Physiology. 1980. 65:151–8.
  24. Steiner D.J., Kim A.,  Miller K.,  Hara M. M.Pancreatic islet plasticity: interspecies comparison of islet architecture and composition. Islets.  2010. 2(3): 135.
  25. Zhedenov V. N. Anatomiya krolika. M.: Sov. nauka. 1957: 312.
  26. Yunan Wang, Abudurexiti Kayoumu, Guotao Lu, Pengfei Xu, Xu Qiu, Liye Chen, Rong Qi, Shouxiong Huang, Weiqin Li, Yuhui. Experimental Models in Syrian Golden Hamster Replicate Human Acute Pancreatitis. Wang & George Liu. 2016: 9.
  27. Cheryl L. A practical guide to the histology of the mouse. Scudamore Mary Lyon Centre, MRC Harwell. 2013: 248.
  28. Prives M. G., Lysenkov N. K., Bushkovich V. I. Anatomiya cheloveka: uchebnik. – 12-e izd., ispr. i dop. SPb. : Gippokrat. 2008: 704.
  29. Kapil Vashisht, Sherry L. Nady, Rita D. Engler, Brain K. Kelsch, Susan N. Lynk, Benjamin R. Cape, Guenter Hoffmann, Emily K. Meseck, Robert C. Jonson. Extraparenchymal Bile. Pancreatic Ducts and Duodenal Papillae: Pathologic Evaluation in Nonclinical Species - A Brief Review. Toxicologic Pathology. 2015. 43: 651–61.
  30. Suckow M. A., Karla A. S., Ronald P. W. The laboratory rabbit, guinea pig, hamster, and other rodents. American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine series. Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier Academic Press. 2012: 1261
  31. Yudichev Yu.F., Degtyarev V.V., Goncharov A.G.Anatomiya zhivotnyh: uchebnoe posobie. V 2-h t. T. 2 . Orenburg: Izdatel`skiy centr OGAU. 2013: 406.
  32. Cathy A. Johnson-Delaney. Anatomy and Physiology of the Rabbit and Rodent Gastrointestinal System. Proceedings of Association of Avian Veterinarians, Association of Exotic Mammal Veterinarians (AEMV) Sessions. 2006: 9–17.
  33. Nozdrachev A. D., Polyakov E. L. Anatomiya krysy. SPb.: Lan`. 2001: 464.
  34. Reznik G., Reznik-Schüller H., Mohr U. Clinical Anatomy of the European Hamster: Cricetus cricetus. L.U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington. 1978: 251
  35. Wagner J.E.,  Manning P. J. The Biology of the Guinea Pig. American College of Laboratory. Animal Medicine Academic Press. 1976: 317
  36. Treuting P. M., Dintzis S.M., Frevert C.W. Comparative Anatomy and Histology: A Mouse and Human Atlas. Elsevier, Amster-dam-Boston-Heilderberg-London-NewYork-Oxford-Paris-SanDiego-SanFrancisco-Singapore-Sydney-Tokyo. 2012: 461
  37. Proshchina A.E., Krivova Y.S.,  Barabanov V.M.,  Saveliev S.V. Ontogeny of neuro-insular complexes and islets innervation in the human pancreas. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2014. 5: 1–8.
  38. Szczurkowski A., Kuchinka J.,  Nowak E.,  Kuder T. Autonomic innervation of pancreas in Egyptian spiny mouse (Acomys cahirinus, Desmarest). Acta Veterinaria Brno. 2009. 78: 557–61.
  39. Andrada Seicean. Challenges in Pancreatic Pathology. InTechOpen. 2017: 240.
  40. Fedorova N.N., Sentyurova L. G. Vliyanie e`tanola na kletki podzheludochnoy zhelezy belyh myshey. Vestnik AGTU. 2010. 1(49): 59-60.
  41. Eurell J. A., Frappier B. L. Dellmann's Textbook of Veterinary Histology. Sixth edition.Blackwell Publishing. 2006: 416.
  42. Celuyko S.S., Krasavina N.P., Korneeva L.S., Lashin S.A., Ostronkov V.S. Morfofunkcional`naya harakteristika podzheludochnoy zhelezy i legkogo pri e`ksperimental`noy giperglikemii na fone primeneniya digidrokvercitina. Blagoveshhensk. 2017: 151.
  43. Kirillovyh A.S. Morfometricheskaya harakteristika e`ndokrinnoy chasti podzheludochnoy zhelezy gryzunov pri ostrom destruktivnom pankreatite. «Innovacii studentov v oblasti veterinarnoy mediciny». 2011: 38–43.
  44. Islam M. S. The Islets of Langerhans. Springer Science & Business Media. 2010: 798.
  45. Baranov S.A., Nechaev V.M. Podzheludochnaya zheleza kak edinyy funkcional`no vzaimosvyazannyy organ. E`ndokrinologiya. Medicinskiy sovet. 2017. 11: 148–51.
  46. Arun R. Pandiri, Eric Schultze. Overview of the Pancreatic Toxicity and Carcinogenesis Session. Pancreatic Toxicity and Carcinogenesis. Toxicologic Pathology. 2014. 42: 204–6.
  47. Shapirova E`.I., Gazizov I.M., Gumerova A.A., Kiyasov A.P. Peribiliarnye zhelezy zhelchnyh protokov kak nisha mul`tipotentnyh stvolovyh kletok. Geny & kletki. 2014.Tom IX, 3: 29–33.

You may be interested